Welcome: Guest

log in

Global Analysis of Weight Reduction Strategies of Major OEMs

Publication Date July 2009
Publisher Frost & Sullivan
Product Type Report
Pages 131
ISBN Number not applicable
Product Code FRS01315
Buy this product or for assistance call +44 20 7060 7474

Summary

Manufacturers Attempt to Reduce the Weight of Their Vehicles to Comply with Emission Standards

Now-a-days, vehicles have an increasing number of advanced features, making them heavier with higher fuel consumption. As customers have become progressively environmentally conscious, the shift from gas-guzzlers to fuel sippers has continued, despite plunging gasoline prices. This is evident from the 25 percent drop in the sales of sports utility and pickup vehicles in North America. It has become a challenge for original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to manufacture more fuel-efficient vehicles without compromising on their performance while, at the same time, complying with stringent CO2 emission and fuel economy standards. The key challenge will be to maintain an optimum balance between cost, weight and performance.

"Carbon dioxide (CO2) emission regulations and fuel consumption improvement are the major factors impelling OEMs to reduce vehicle weight," says the analyst of this research. "The European Parliament has approved a stringent CO2 limit which mandates car manufacturers to cut car emissions from the current level of 160 g/km of CO2 to 120 g/km by 2012 to 2015." At the same time, the U.S. Government is focusing on developing fuel-efficient vehicles. According to the U.S. President Obama's administration plan for the 2016 model year, the new-vehicle fleet in the United States will average 35.5 miles per gallon (mpg).

OEMs to Develop Technologies for Long-term Sustainability of Fuel-Efficient Vehicles

Currently, the production of lightweight materials, especially carbon fibers, is very expensive. They have been slow to replace steel as the primary material used in new cars due to the energy needed to heat as well as the extensive capital equipment required to manufacture such materials. The economic slowdown coupled with expensive light weight materials used as a replacement for certain heavy materials is a major challenge for the market participants as the OEMs need to make investments. "The biggest challenge facing the market currently is the recession which has tied the hands of OEMs with regard to investment," cautions the analyst. "Added to this is the high cost of certain light weight materials used as replacements for heavy materials."

European and Asian OEMs have more experience in manufacturing fuel-efficient vehicles as they need to comply with fuel economy standards and emissions regulations. However, it will be more challenging for the U.S. OEMs, for whom stringent fuel economy standards have recently been introduced, to shift from larger gas-guzzlers to fuel sippers and to convince their customers to buy smaller cars. "Although the Americans can adopt certain successful European and Asian OEM strategies in the short-term, it is important to develop technologies for long-term sustainability," advises the analyst. "While OEMs in the United States have resorted to introducing small car models, their European counterparts should focus on weight reduction in their small and mid-size vehicle models."

View Sample Pages

Content

  • 1. Executive Summary
    • 1.1 Top Strategic Fact Sheet
    • 1.2 Methods of Weight Reduction
    • 1.3 Vehicle Weight Reduction Potential
    • 1.4 Key Weight Reduction Techniques
    • 1.5 Legislations Influencing Weight Reduction
    • 1.6 Vehicle Weight Band – Europe
    • 1.7 Vehicle Weight Band – The United States
    • 1.8 Key Weight Reduction Techniques vs. Cost Difference
    • 1.9 Use of Aluminium in the Car
    • 1.10 Use of Plastics in the Car – Trend by Application Area
    • 1.11 Decision Making Structure for Weight Reduction
    • 1.12 Key Conclusion
  • 2. Vehicle Weight Reduction – Industry Challenges, Market Drivers and Restraints and Legislation
    • 2.1 Industry Challenges
    • 2.2 Market Drivers and Restraints
    • 2.3 Legislation
  • 3. Analysis and Forecasts of Weight Reduction in the Automotive Body In White (BIW)
    • 3.1 Body In White
    • 3.2 Materials and Adhesives
    • 3.3 Case Studies
  • 4. Analysis and Forecasts of Weight Reduction in the Automotive Powertrain Modules and Systems
    • 4.1 Lightweight Trends in Transmissions
    • 4.2 Engine Downsizing
  • 5. Analysis and Forecasts of Weight Reduction in the Automotive Chassis Modules and Systems
    • 5.1 Braking
    • 5.2 Suspension
    • 5.3 Steering
  • 6. Analysis and Forecasts of Weight Reduction in the Automotive Interior Modules and Systems
    • 6.1 Seats
    • 6.2 Glazing
    • 6.3 Doors and Cockpit
    • 6.4 HVAC
  • 7. Weight Reduction Concepts and Examples
    • 7.1 Electric Corner Module
    • 7.2 Gordon Murray's T.25 Concept
    • 7.3 Audi Aluminum Space Frame
    • 7.4 Mercedes C Class
    • 7.5 Mazda
    • 7.6 Volkswagen 1 Litre Concept Car
    • 7.7 BMW 7 Series
  • 8. Weight Reduction Strategies of Major OEMs
    • 8.1 Ford
    • 8.2 Hyundai
    • 8.3 Nissan
    • 8.4 Fiat
    • 8.5 Daimler
    • 8.6 BMW
    • 8.7 Toyota
    • 8.8 General Motors
  • 9. Voice of the Consumers – Results from Consumer Study (Europe)
    • 9.1 Consumer Study – Key Conclusion
    • 9.2 Perception of Environment Sustainability
    • 9.3 Perception on Vehicle Emission
    • 9.4 Perception on Engine Downsizing
    • 9.5 Perception on Fuel Economy
  • 10. Key Findings and Conclusion
    • 10.1 Weight Reduction Forecast (Europe and The United States)
    • 10.2 Vehicle Weight Reduction vs. CO2 Emission (Europe)
    • 10.3 Vehicle Weight Band (Europe)
    • 10.4 Vehicle Weight Band (The United States)
    • 10.5 Decision Making Structure for Weight Reduction
    • 10.6 Value Chain Analysis of OEMs Decision Making on Supplier Selection for Plastics
    • 10.7 Conclusion
Delivery Details

PDF:Delivered by email within 12 to 24 hours of placing the order (Mon-Fri

Industry Events