Market Competitive Intensity (MCI): Finland

Content

• Datamonitor View
• Catalyst
• Summary
• Analysis
  • Introduction: Datamonitor's Mci Index Offers A Robust Framework for Measuring The Development of Energy Market Competitive Intensity
  • The Mci Index Shows How Attractive A Particular Market Is to New Entrants in Terms of The Competitive Environment
  • The Mci Assessment Draws on Nine Underlying Metrics Grouped into Three Broad Clusters: Market Framework; Supplier Push; Customer Pull
  • The Mci Index Measures Competitive Intensity in Eu 27 and 6 Related Markets
  • The Mci Index Assesses Markets as They Stood in Early 2008 and Forecasts Conditions Likely to Be Prevailing Three Years after Full Market Opening
  • Each of The Nine Pillars Has An Assessment Scale to Allow for The Comparison of Diverse Markets (See Appendix for More Details)
  • Two Differing Overall Mci Scores Are Calculated to Ensure Full Clarity of Results
  • A Simple Weighted Average (Additive) Measure Shows Overall Competitive Intensity
  • A Weighted Multiple (Multiplicative) Measure Shows Overall Competitive Intensity
  • The Mci Framework Has A Number of Applications for Your Organization
  • Context: Finland's Power Market Is More Developed Compared to Many Other Eu Nations
  • Finland's Power Customer Pull Metrics Show Particular Weakness throughout The Forecast Period
  • Finland's Weak Gas Metrics Create An Mci Score Very Much at The Lower End of The European Scale
  • Power Mci: Apart from Consumer Representation, The Power Metrics Remain at The Upper Part of The Scale
  • All of Finland's Market Framework Factors Score Highly
  • Effectiveness of Regulator [2008: 8.5/10 2010: 9/10]
  • Ease of Third Party Access [2008: 7/10 2010: 8/10]
  • Effectiveness of Balancing and Data Transfer [2008: 8/10 2010: 8.5/10]
  • Supplier Push Metrics Remain Ahead of What Is Seen in Many Other Eu Power Markets
  • Wholesale Market Fragmentation [2008: 4.5/10 2010: 5.5/10]
  • Retail Market Fragmentation [2008: 8/10 2010: 8.5/10]
  • Traded Market Maturity [2008: 8.5/10 2010: 9.5/10]
  • Finland's Switching Rates Are amongst The Highest in The Eu
  • Access to Market Information and Assistance [2008: 7/10 2010: 8/10]
  • Consumer Representation [2008: 3/10 2010: 4/10]
  • Propensity to Switch [2008: 7/10 2010: 8/10]
  • Gas Mci: All of Finland's Gas Metrics Score at The Lower End of The Scale
  • Finland's Gas Market Framework Scores Are in Stark Contrast to Those Seen in The Power Sector
  • Effectiveness of Regulator [2008: 2.5/10 2010: 3/10]
  • Ease of Third Party Access [2008: 1/10 2010: 2/10]
  • Effectiveness of Balancing and Data Transfer [2008: 1/10 2010: 2/10]
  • Retail Market Fragmentation Is The Only Significantly Scoring Supplier Push Metric
  • Wholesale Market Fragmentation [2008: 0/10 2010: 1/10]
  • Retail Market Fragmentation [2008:7/10 2010: 7.5/10]
  • Traded Market Maturity [2008: 0/10 2010: 0/10]
  • Lack of Switching and Access to Market Information Curtails The Customer Pull Metrics
  • Access to Market Information and Assistance [2008: 0/10 2010: 1.5/10]
  • Consumer Representation [2008: 2/10 2010: 2.5/10]
  • Propensity to Switch [2008: 0/10 2010: 0/10]
  • Outlook: Finland's Lack of Gas Competitive Intensity Restricts New Entrants in The Short to Medium Term
  • Competitive Intensity in Power Markets Will Remain Higher than That Seen in The Gas Market
  • Power Scores
  • Gas Scores
  • Commercial Opportunities Potentially Exist in Energy Retailing
  • New Market Entrant Opportunities, Power
  • New Market Entrant Threats, Power
  • Commercial Opportunities in The Finnish Gas Sector Are Limited, but Potentially Exist If Wholesale Gas Supplies Can Be Secured
  • New Market Entrant Opportunities, Gas
  • New Market Entrant Threats, Gas
  • Mci Scores
• Appendix
  • Definitions
  • Ask The Analyst
• List of Tables
  • Table 1: Market Competitive Intensity, Finland 2008-10
  • Table 2: Mci Additive, Europe 2008-2010
  • Table 3: Mci Multiplicative, Europe 2008-2010
• List of Figures
  • Figure 1: Mci Assessment Scale
  • Figure 2: Mci Assessment Framework
  • Figure 3: Mci Market Coverage
  • Figure 4: Mci Scales
  • Figure 5: Mci Applications
  • Figure 6: European Power Market Competitive Intensity, 2008-10
  • Figure 7: European Gas Market Competitive Intensity, 2008-10
  • Figure 8: Power Market Competitive Intensity, Finland
  • Figure 9: Gas Market Competitive Intensity, Finland
  • Figure 10: Market Competitive Intensity, Finland
  • Figure 11: Scale for Mci Assessment, Effectiveness of Regulator
  • Figure 12: Scale for Mci Assessment, Ease of Third Party Access
  • Figure 13: Scale for Mci Assessment, Effectiveness of Balancing and Data Transfer
  • Figure 14: Scale for Mci Assessment, Wholesale Market Fragmentation
  • Figure 15: Scale for Mci Assessment, Retail Market Fragmentation
  • Figure 16: Scale for Mci Assessment, Traded Market Maturity
  • Figure 17: Scale for Mci Assessment, Access to Market Information and Assistance
  • Figure 18: Scale for Mci Assessment, Consumer Representation
  • Figure 19: Scale for Mci Assessment, Propensity to Switch