North American LNG 2006
Market and offshore regasification technology analysis
| Publication Date | February 2006 |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Utilis Energy |
| Product Type | Report |
| Pages | 91 |
| ISBN Number | not applicable |
| Product Code | UEY00004 |
Summary
North America, and in particular the US, requires additional sources of energy to meet expected increases in demand over the decades to come. While it is commonly known that the US has imported the majority of its crude oil for some time, it is a lesser known fact that US natural gas production has been unable to keep pace with domestic demand and that incremental increases in natural gas imports from Canada are not expected to offset future demand growth.
Such market fundamentals, in addition to recent price increases, create a favorable environment for increased imports of LNG - which, during 2004, amounted to 652 Bcf, roughly half the expected future demand. However, greater reliance on LNG is stymied by the lack of sufficient capacity at US regasification terminals. Only five such terminals are currently operation in the US and regulatory hurdles and opposition from both public and private bodies has hindered the construction of additional regasification infrastructure.
The US LNG market underwent a fundamental change when in August 2005, President George W. Bush signed the Energy Policy Act. This Act clarified the Federal government's role in the siting and operation of onshore and near shore LNG import terminals and gives the FERC the ultimate authority over states on LNG issues.
By the end of 2005, the FERC had approved twelve LNG terminals and the US Coast Guard had approved two. Most of these proposed LNG terminals will be sited in the Gulf of Mexico, causing relatively little opposition from a region already accustomed to abundant petroleum industry infrastructure. Twenty more facilities are currently proposed, twelve under the authority of the FERC and the eight offshore under the authority of the Coast Guard.
To facilitate the importation and regasification of LNG there has been a rapid expansion in the range of alternative offshore LNG importation methods. These new methods are expected to compete with conventional onshore regasification terminals.
The catalyst for alternative, offshore LNG regasification centers on several issues and concerns shared by individuals, communities and governments. These can be broadly defined as:
- Environmental;
- Security and safety; and
- Regulatory.
One of the most appealing features of offshore LNG import terminals is their lack of environmental impact on shorelines and population centers. An offshore LNG import terminal is a relatively small and isolated installation and in the unlikely event of an accident, few would be affected.
The enhanced security and safety of offshore LNG infrastructure is the result of their remoteness. Access to offshore LNG facilities can be monitored and restricted to a much greater extent than onshore installations.
US offshore LNG facilities are under the jurisdiction of the US Coast Guard not the FERC. The US Coast Guard is less bureaucratic and more efficient than the FERC generally, approving LNG project applications in one year, while it usually takes the FERC 18 months or more to approve an onshore facility.
Offshore receiving technologies can be defined by the following categories:
- Offshore gravity based structures (GBS) - A GBS LNG import terminal consists of concrete or steel caissons located on the seabed. This type of installation is totally self-supporting with respect to its operation, utilities and power generation;
- Platform based import terminals - The utilization of existing oil and gas platform structures, converting them to accommodate LNG deliveries;
- Floating storage regas units (FSRU) - An LNG import terminal concept consists of a purpose built, permanently moored steel structure with LNG carriers shuttling between an export facility and the import site; and
- Regasification vessels - A standard LNG carrier modified in order to enable the vessel to discharge regasified LNG to a subsea pipeline, through an internal turret arrangement connected to an offshore mooring buoy.
Each of these offshore regasification technologies have their own specific merits and disadvantages and their use will be highly dependent on various environmental factors, such as water depth and other logistics.
Evolving LNG market fundamentals, regulatory changes within the US government and innovative offshore regasification technologies are setting the stage for a promising future for LNG imports into the United States. These imports will play a significant role in helping the US greater diversify its sources of global energy supply.
This study explores the development of the US LNG market and its increasingly important role for America's energy security. The study also considers other issues and provides a detailed evaluation of new offshore regas technologies.
Content
- Executive summary
- Introduction
- Existing import terminals
- Us Natural Gas Market Fundamentals
- LNG economics
- Import terminal cost considerations
- US natural gas demand
- US natural gas production
- US natural gas prices
- US LNG demand
- LNG pricing
- Global natural gas demand
- Conclusions
- Us Lng Developments
- Introduction
- Energy Policy Act
- Conclusions
- North American LNG project summary
- Gulf Coast projects
- East Coast projects
- West Coast projects
- LNG project overview
- Project opposition
- Conclusions
- Offshore regas technologies
- Introduction
- Catalyst for development
- Offshore LNG receiving technologies
- Gasification systems utilized by offshore facilities
- Offshore economics
- Conclusions
- Gravity-based systems
- Key points
- Introduction
- LNG projects planning to use gravity-based terminals
- GBS engineering firms
- Conclusions
- Existing oil/gas platforms
- Key points
- Introduction
- Platform conversion projects
- Conclusions
- Floating Storage & Regasification Units (FSRU)
- Key points
- Introduction
- Operational issues
- FSRU projects
- FSRU economics
- Conclusions
- Regasificaiton vessels
- Key points
- Introduction
- Excelerate Energy - Energy Bridge System
- Advanced Production and Loading
- Hoegh LNG
- Conclusions
- Recommendations & Conclusions
- Introduction
- Summary of offshore LNG strengths and weaknesses
- Figures
- Figure 1: US natural gas production, 1990-2004
- Figure 2: US wellhead natural gas prices, 1990-2004
- Figure 3: US LNG sector demand, 2015
- Figure 4: Flow of US natural gas imports/exports, 2004
- Figure 5: US LNG imports by terminal, 2004
- Figure 6: US LNG imports by country of origin, 2004 (MMcf)
- Figure 7: Average price of LNG imports, 1990-2004 ($/Mcf)
- Figure 8: Current/planned deepwater LNG ports
- Figure 9: Proposed/existing North American LNG projects, Jan. 2006
- Figure 10: Offshore LNG facilities
- Figure 11: LNG regas import terminals segmented by water depth
- Figure 12: Offshore LNG regasification systems
- Figure 13: Gravity based LNG regas structure
- Figure 14: Isola di Porto Levante LNG receiving terminal
- Figure 15: Aker Kvaerner depiction of a GBS LNG facility
- Figure 16: Saipem offshore GBS LNG facility
- Figure 17: Existing platform conversion to LNG terminal
- Figure 18: Crystal Energy's Platform Grace
- Figure 19: Crystal Clearwater Port Project
- Figure 20: Elevation view of Crystal Clearwater LNG project
- Figure 21: MPEH LNG receiving terminal
- Figure 22: MPEH - upper deck configuration
- Figure 23: MPEH - middle deck configuration
- Figure 24: MPEH - lower deck configuration
- Figure 25: MPEH - elevation view
- Figure 26: Spectrum Energy Services - Apollo LNG terminal
- Figure 27: LNG carrier berthed to an FSRU
- Figure 28: LNG containment systems
- Figure 29: FSRU - side by side offloading configuration
- Figure 30: FSRU to shore LNG pipeline interface
- Figure 31: Sloshing phenomena shown in membrane tank
- Figure 32: Location of BHP Billiton's Cabrillio Port LNG project
- Figure 33: FSRU vs. Onshore LNG regas operating costs
- Figure 34: Excelerate Energy - Energy Bridge System
- Figure 35: Excelerate EBRV pipeline interconnections
- Figure 36: APL submerged offloading buoy
- Figure 37: Energy Bridge mooring system components
- Tables
- Table 1: Summary of offshore regas characteristics
- Table 2: Existing US LNG terminals
- Table 3: Basic LNG Economics
- Table 4: US monthly waterborne LNG imports (Bcf)
- Table 5: US LNG imports, monthly averages (Bcf/day)
- Table 6: LNG cargo diversions from US terminals, 2005 (Bcf)
- Table 7: Source of US LNG Imports, 1995-2000 (Bcf)
- Table 8: North American LNG project details, Jan. 2006 (a)
- Table 9: North American LNG project details, Jan. 2006 (b)
- Table 10: Offshore/Onshore LNG regas terminal cost comparison
- Table 11: Benefits of concrete and steel LNG storage
- Table 12: MPEH operational expectations
- Table 13: Typical FSRU design and operating specifications
- Table 14: FSRU operating costs (US $)
- Table 15: Summary of offshore regas characteristics
About this Product
Delivery Details
PDF:Delivered by email within 12 to 24 hours of placing the order (Mon-Fri)
PRINT/CD-ROM:Despatched within 2 to 4 working days.
Related Products
Energy & Utilities
call +44 (0) 20 7060 7474
or email us
Resources
Why Report Buyer?
Advertising/Affiliates
View Our Publishers
News
About Us
Market Publishers
Meet Us
Jobs
Contact Us
Categories and Subcategories


















