1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Deliverables
1.2 Study Assumptions
1.3 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Increasing Number of Technological Advances in Spinal Surgery
4.2.2 Increasing Incidences of Obesity and Degenerative Spinal Conditions
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Expensive Treatment Procedures
4.3.2 Stringent Reimbursement Concerns
4.4 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
4.4.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.4 Threat of Substitute Products
4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SEGMENTATION
5.1 By Device Type
5.1.1 Spinal Decompression
5.1.1.1 Corpectomy
5.1.1.2 Discectomy
5.1.1.3 Facetectomy
5.1.1.4 Foraminotomy
5.1.1.5 Laminotomy
5.1.2 Spinal Fusion
5.1.2.1 Cervical Fusion
5.1.2.2 Interbody Fusion
5.1.2.3 ThoracoLumbar Fusion
5.1.2.4 Others
5.1.3 Fracture Repair Devices
5.1.4 Arthroplasty Devices
5.1.5 Non-fusion Devices

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Company Profiles
6.1.1 Zimmer Biomet
6.1.2 Stryker Corporation
6.1.3 Johnson & Johnson
6.1.4 Medtronic plc
6.1.5 Globus Medical
6.1.6 SeaSpine Holdings Corporation
6.1.7 Orthofix Holdings Inc.
6.1.8 Nuvasive Inc.
6.1.9 Joimax GmbH
6.1.10 RTI Surgical Holdings, Inc.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS

Companies Mentioned
 - Zimmer Biomet
- Stryker Corporation
- Johnson & Johnson
- Medtronic plc
- Globus Medical
- SeaSpine Holdings Corporation
- Orthofix Holdings Inc.
- Nuvasive Inc.
- Joimax GmbH
- RTI Surgical Holdings, Inc.