1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Deliverables
1.2 Study Assumptions
1.3 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.3 Market Restraints
4.4 Porter's Five Force Analysis
4.4.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.4.3 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.4 Threat of Substitute Products
4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SEGMENTATION
5.1 Type
5.1.1 Nitrogenous Fertilizers
5.1.1.1 Urea
5.1.1.2 Calcium Ammonium Nitrate (CAN)
5.1.1.3 Ammonia
5.1.1.4 Ammonium Nitrate
5.1.1.5 Ammonium Sulfate
5.1.1.6 Other Nitrogenous Fertilizers
5.1.2 Phosphatic Fertilizers
5.1.2.1 Mono-Ammonium Phosphate (MAP)
5.1.2.2 Di-Ammonium Phosphate (DAP)
5.1.2.3 Triple Superphosphate (TSP)
5.1.2.4 Other Phosphatic Fertilizers
5.1.3 Potash Fertilizers
5.1.3.1 Muriate of Potash (MOP)
5.1.3.2 Other Potash Fertilizers
5.1.4 Secondary Nutrient Fertilizers
5.1.5 Micronutrients
5.2 Application
5.2.1 Grains and Cereals
5.2.2 Pulses and Oil Seeds
5.2.3 Commercial Crops
5.2.4 Fruits and Vegetables
5.2.5 Other Applications

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Most Adopted Strategies
6.2 Market Share Analysis
6.3 Company Profiles
6.3.1 PT. Pupuk Sriwidjaya Palembang
6.3.2 PT Petrokimia Gresik
6.3.3 PT Pupuk Kujang
6.3.4 PT. Pupuk Kalimantan Timur
6.3.5 PT Pupuk Iskandar Muda
6.3.6 PT Jadi Mas
6.3.7 Wilmar International Limited
6.3.8 Kuok Group (Agrifert)
6.3.9 PT. Dupan Anugerah Lestari

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS

8 AN ASSESSMENT OF COVID-19 IMPACT ON THE MARKET

Companies Mentioned
 - PT. Pupuk Sriwidjaya Palembang
- PT Petrokimia Gresik
- PT Pupuk Kujang
- PT. Pupuk Kalimantan Timur
- PT Pupuk Iskandar Muda
- PT Jadi Mas
- Wilmar International Limited
- Kuok Group (Agrifert)
- PT. Dupan Anugerah Lestari