Footwear: Scandinavia Industry Guide
- June 2014
- 61 pages
- Report ID: 138996
The Scandinavian Footwear industry guide provides top-line qualitative and quantitative summary information including: market size (value 2009-13, and forecast to 2018). The guide also contains descriptions of the leading players including key financial metrics and analysis of competitive pressures within the market.
Features and benefits
* Save time carrying out entry-level research by identifying the size, growth, and leading players in the Scandinavian footwear market.
* Use the Five Forces analysis to determine the competitive intensity and therefore attractiveness of the Scandinavian footwear market.
* Leading company profiles reveal details of key footwear market players’ Scandinavian operations and financial performance.
* Add weight to presentations and pitches by understanding the future growth prospects of the Scandinavian footwear market with five year forecasts.
* Compares data from Denmark, Norway and Sweden, alongside individual chapters on each country.
The Scandinavian footwear market had a total market value of $4,481.8 million in 2013. Norway was the fastest growing country with a CAGR of 1.9% over the 2009-13 period.
Within the footwear industry, Denmark is the leading country among the Scandinavian countries, with market revenues of $1,733.0 million in 2013. This was followed by Sweden and Norway, with $1,632.9 and $1,115.9 million, respectively.
Denmark is expected to lead the footwear in the Scandinavian countries, with a value of $2,152.2 million in 2018, followed by Sweden and Norway with expected values of $1,744.7 and $1,223.0 million respectively.
Your key questions answered
* What was the size of the Scandinavian footwear market by value in 2013?
* What will be the size of the Scandinavian footwear market in 2018?
* What factors are affecting the strength of competition in the Scandinavian footwear market?
* How has the market performed over the last five years?
* How large is the Scandinavian footwear market in relation to its regional counterparts?